Sir Richard Francis Burton was a lot of things. He was an explorer, writer, soldier, orientalist, ethnologist, poet, hypnotist, fencer and diplomat. Most importantly, he was a translator and linguist who spoke 29 languages of European, Asian, and African varieties.
The Life of Sir Richard Burton quotes him explaining his technique:
I got a simple grammar and vocabulary, marked out the forms and words which I knew were absolutely necessary1, and learnt them by heart. … I never worked more than a quarter of an hour at a time2, for after that the brain lost its freshness. After learning some three hundred words3, easily done in a week, I stumbled through some easy book-work4 and underlined every word that I wished to recollect, in order to read over my pencillings at least once a day5 … Having finished my volume, I then carefully worked up the grammar minutiae6, and I then chose some other book whose subject most interested me7. The neck of the language was now broken, and progress was rapid. If I came across a new sound, like the Arabic Ghayn, I trained my tongue to it by repeating it8 so many thousand times a day. When I read, I invariably read out loud9, so that the ear might aid memory. I was delighted with the most difficult characters10, Chinese and Cuneiform, because I felt that they impressed themselves more strongly upon the eye than the eternal Roman letters.
I first heard of this account of Sir Richard Burton in Scott Thornbury’s How to Teach Vocabulary, and became very interested in his technique as it’s very similar to the process I go through in my own self-studies. Of course, he lacked a few tools that we have at our disposal in this age of IT, but breaking down his learning process we see the following ten points:
- He made a list of core vocabulary. A commonly accepted basic core vocabulary of English is around 2000 words, which would give an understanding of 9 out of 10 words in the average text.
- He managed his time wisely. Instead of pushing through cram sessions, he did study rounds. (This can also be referred to as timeboxing.)
- He set short-term goals for his own language process. Instead of just having the amazingly intimidating goal of “Learn language X”*, he made short steps of progress. He most likely did this using distributed practice. (This can also be referred to as spaced repetition.)
*It’s impossible to determine when you’ve “learned” a language, because how do you define the state of completion? Do you, for example, know the entire English language? - He engaged himself in graded readings.
- He made studying a daily habit.
- He analyzed grammar after being exposed to it.*
*I’ll write in a later post a little more on my thoughts of the lexical approach to grammar. - He engaged himself with the language by studying topics that he was interested in.
- He would keep the language in his mind throughout the day.
- He vocalized speech as he read it, which made him use more parts of his brain and helped him to better internalize the language. I also think subvocalization is a legitimate application.
- He was intrinsically motivated to study.
He did all of that without a computer, the internet, an electronic dictionary, a television, or an MP3 player, all while pursuing the advancement of his other trades. Now think of the sort of advantage that we have living in the age that we do.
Related posts:
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
Amazing what he did without google
I prefer to learn a lot of vocabulary than study grammar ’cause in most cases, the grammar construction is easy to understand without studying it, if you know a lot of vocabs.
I was born in Spain (Catalan and Spanish as a native languages). In primary school I was very bad in grammar studies of my own language, although I used to talk in these languages and I can construct a sentence and understand a lot of situations (when I was a child). Also seems to happen with english lessons (at primary school), I was pretty bad in grammar lessons… but while I was growing, I used to read some newspapers, and computer science websites in english and learning some vocabulary every day. Without spending my money with english academies, I think that I can understand a lot of situations right now.
Well.. but I’m studying grammar for JLPT3 ’cause it’s extremely concrete, is not about to know japanese, is about what they are going to ask me to fail the answer.
Well.. nice blog, I’m reading it for a weeks but it’s my first comment
Hi Alex,
Interesting post! I had not heard of Sir Richard Burton before. Both he and you seem to share many of the same non-conventional notions on language learning as we do at LingQ. I was wondering if you are aware of our site and whether you have ever had the opportunity to take a look at it.
We would love to have you review our site on your blog. I think it could be very beneficial for your readers and students to supplement what they are doing with LingQ.
I invite you to come and look around, http://www.lingq.com. We offer free, as well as paid, membership levels. If you are interested in experimenting with our tutoring services at all, please just email me and I can set that up for you.
Keep up the good work on your blog!
Hello Mr. Kaufmann,
I am indeed familiar with LingQ, although I haven’t had the time to get into it in depth. As it is now, most of my study takes place in conventionally analog resources. I may take a closer look at the LingQ system around December or January.
Two things strike me about Sir Richard’s approach, he was committed to learning a little everyday and he used multiple techniques. The technology is secondary.